Talk F1 Member Posts
KG's Profile
Current Avatar:
KG's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To KG's Posts
08 Oct 2017 07:21:24
It's meant to be precise, and technical, and pushing things to the limits. Doesn't mean anything about taking enjoyment out of an event that allows the possible deaths of other human beings.
I'm fine with the Halo if it could potentially save a single life. Now, the engine sound and lack of passing chances are things that can be fixed, and should be. .there's still tons of danger to drivers even without the halo, but to place a person's life in greater risk bc of a small aesthetic dislike isn't something I'd want. WIsh there was a better solution at the moment, but clearly there isn't, hopefully they continue working on finding better answers. Just my opinion, you are all entitled to yours. Currently enjoying Japan. .what a track.
{Ed001's Note - that isn't the point. The point is Halo is a crap idea, it looks rubbish and does not really protect them properly as well as blocking part of their view. It should either be open or closed cockpit, not this half measure that achieves nothing bar making the cars uglier.}